Saturday, 30 June 2007

The Psyche of Debate

Having spent some 7-8 months on Orkut in general and being a part of several communities, the psyche of debate has begun to interest me.There is a statement. One person agrees to it. The other disagrees. Both give reasons for their agreeing/disagreeing. So far so good. The trouble begins, when one starts the unconscious effort to convert the other to his/her belief. And then a number of things may happen.1. The convincing power of one is so good/his reasons are so valid, the other person becomes a convert. (Rare)2. The two appreciate each other’s views but agree to disagree. (Commoner)3. When one is too eager to convince the other, but fails to do so, one in utter disgust goes down to the level of verbal attack, using foul words at the worst and sarcasm at the best. Consequence - mayhem. (Commonest)One may ask, why enter into a debate then? If no conclusions are reached and if everyone, ultimately starts fighting? Well, I would say a lot of information does come your way for you to analyze during a debate. If u like it, option 1 is open! If u don’t, option 2 is open, too! If we are debating about anything under the sun, some are bound to disagree. I empathize with the tendency to putting one's points across. I sympathize, to an extent, with the tendency to try converting another to one's way of thinking (rather a silly thing, largely). But what I fail to understand is, why should one lose one's temper if one can’t change another's opinion? Why go down to abuse and personal attack? Why lose one's cool?

4 comments:

Mandar said...

hmmm....you are right as to the three possible outcomes of the debate. assuming that every person does have a pre determined view about the issue before posting or even a view which he formed then by himself, and then again if the person believes in his own reasoning ability he will hold on to that view in all probability...

so a debate in which a change of views is only possible that too due to complete agreement of one party to with proper tought and consideration to the other's views is only possible when the lets say two people involved do agree on the most other notions and the thing being discussed is a completely new territory for one of them. then he may respect the other person's views.
secondly the personal attacks and stuff as you say does start due to one person who tries to convert the other to his views (here theres one more problem but i need not discuss it here). why he does this i do not know. and well the personal attacks start again giving reasons for them is gonna be too lengthy. and others join in coz well its enjoyable and well mayb not fun for you but as in case of everything peoples ideas of fun also differ. when it starts basically already known that none will change their views.

Mandar said...

lol.....the comment is about as large as the post...and full of bullshit...

AbodhBalok said...

i dont know whether you ever thought like this..but, i feel i always debate to bring the reason out of me...sometimes i fail to write something down on paper though i know everything about it..but wen i have debated about it somewhere, then i can put it on paper more easily...

COOLDEEPTEA said...

ah yes - i have experienced so several times. only i dnt like to call those occasions 'debates' but 'discussions'.
in debates i hve mostly ended up being sarcastic or given up...lol!